2/8/2024 0 Comments Vivid for mac instalI remember reading about it in the past, but also depends on what will be on the user end system.NET has a huge library which is a bit too big for mobile systems pretty sure, and if you compare against GCC, it seems 80% of that is for optimizations and cross compiling compared to very small purpose built compiler toolsets. Java and the intermediate token state would let you run anywhere if you have the JIT/interpreter but optimizations mostly go out the window. A typical compiler will tokenize, create an intermediate format, feed to optimizers and generate final code. Depends on what stage they are using it at. TBH though, for any non intensive tasks are going to be JavaScript/electron type things, with direct compilation for other things. Funnily enough it’s only recently got some cross compatability with other systems. Nightcraw1er.488: Why would they need Java for that, they already have. Such a processor could have say 100 instances of itself running inside for very low power, and only resource management ( locking) would be needed. Though i am curious if someone would make a 1 instruction processor that can be plugged in and run as a proof of concept, rather than just an ISO with that in mind to run on ARM machines. ' Status' is a terrible reason to get a product. I don't care if it has a ' Acer approved' or ' Microsoft Genuine' or ' Apple' on it, hell i cover up labels with my own. Actually recent purchases tend to be refurbished Chromebooks that i flash and put linux on for $50 a pop. I'd rather buy a $20 monitor with stand and have it ready to work ( even if it's CRT) rather than $1k for a stand alone. It depends more on how nicely resources play at that point.Īs someone who is frugal like myself I'd never consider Apple products. Though it is possible they are moving towards say 10 lite processors rather than 1-2 heavy duty ones, which would make sense. ![]() They are ticking off a lot of developers and owners.Īs for the move to ARM, ARM makes sense as it's a low powered chip and lots of chips later in their life cycle get better optimized and can be run lower powered, but for a desktop machine it seems a little silly. Honestly they need to make an emulation/compatibility suite for iphone and their machines so they can run software as though it were different OS versions for compatibility reasons. Sure, there are marketable reasons, but jumping horses to their own chip fab seems like a bizarre longterm decision. Maybe I haven't read deep enough into it, but the switch to a new architecture seems to have been a completely arbitrary one. Especially as more designers and artists start to realize that Apple is no longer the Pixar Computer it once was. ![]() When was the last time a major innovation was announced, or a new product was introduced? The world laughed at their $1k monitor stand, and I'm not entirely sure if being a luxury brand/status symbol will last. Sure, there are marketable reasons, but jumping horses to their own chip fab seems like a bizarre longterm decision.ĭarvond: Oh, I tend to think that they've been in Headless Chicken mode since the departure of Steve Jobs and are coasting on momentum. ![]() Oh, I tend to think that they've been in Headless Chicken mode since the departure of Steve Jobs and are coasting on momentum. Although if all their devices use the same set it would make things a bit easier. I do like how ARM is RISC ( Reduced instruction set) but hard to see why they are making the move. Looking up it seems the new M1 machines seem to be moving to ARM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |